Kimberly-Clark v. First Quality: Request to Require Defendant to Present Deposition Testimony in Plaintiff's Case Denied Because It Would Interfere with Defendant's Trial Presentation


As this patent infringement action proceed toward trial, plaintiff Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. ("Kimberly-Clark") filed a request with the district court on an "extremely time-sensitive case management issue concerning the use of depositions at trial and deposition designations." During a telephonic status conference, Kimberly-Clark requested that the district require the defendants First Quality Baby Products, LLC ("First Quality") present at trial any deposition testimony of Kimberly Clark's testifying employee witnesses when they are called by Kimberly-Clark instead of during First Quality's case-in-chief.

As part of its request, Kimberly-Clark asserted that its proposed procedure would be more efficient and would prevent delay and any potential confusion that would be created by calling the same witnesses to testify, whether by live testimony or by depositions, during different phases of the trial. First Quality opposed Kimberly-Clark's request by arguing that this type of procedure would improperly permit Kimberly-Clark to dictate the manner in which First Quality presents its case.

After the telephone conference ended, the district court denied Kimberly-Clark's request. Although there might efficiencies in witness testimony in the procedure proposed by Kimberly-Clark, the district court found that the request would impinge upon the ability of First Quality to present its case. "Upon consideration of the foregoing, we will deny KC's request. FQ must be permitted to present its case as it sees fit, and we cannot require FQ to present its case out of order simply for the convenience of KC. We further that KC's proposed procedure would be more confusing to the jury than permitting the parties to call their respective witnesses during their cases-in-chief. Although some additional time may be required through this manner of presentation, in fairness, FQ's position is well taken."

Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. v. First Quality Baby Products, LLC, Case No. 1:09-cv-1685 (M.D. Penn. Sept. 18, 2013)

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.