Limiting E-Discovery in Intellectual Property Litigation: The International Trade Commission Follows a Warmly Welcomed Trend

more+
less-

Pryor Cashman Partner James Klaiber, a member of the firm's Intellectual Property Group, and Associate Leighton Dellinger have written an article discussing the sources of e-discovery costs and what the International Trade Commission and other litigation forums are doing to contain them. The article, entitled "Limiting E-Discovery in Intellectual Property Litigation: The International Trade Commission Follows a Warmly Welcomed Trend," was published in the December 14, 2012 edition of the BNA Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal.

On October 2, 2012, the International Trade Commission, which is charged with investigating claims of unfair competition based on intellectual property infringement, proposed rules that would limit electronic discovery in patent infringement investigations conducted by the Commission. Intended to bring down the cost of intellectual property litigation, these proposed rules represent the most recent measure in a broad federal campaign to limit e-discovery costs.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Pryor Cashman LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

Pryor Cashman LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×