Lack of Standing Is an Affirmative Defense – Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Reeves

more+
less-

In this mortgage foreclosure case, the trial court dismissed the lender’s complaint for fraud on the court.  One aspect of the supposed “fraud” was the lender’s allegation that it had standing to sue on behalf of a valid securitized trustee.  Reciting the law on contesting standing, the appellate court stated, “Lack of standing is an affirmative defense.  Generally, this affirmative defense must be asserted in the responsive pleading and the issue is then determined upon evidence presented or the party’s inability to produce sufficient evidence of its standing.”  In this case, because the borrower had only moved to dismiss and had not yet filed an answer, the appellate court reversed on the basis that “this issue was not properly before the trial court at the pre-answer stage of the litigation.”

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Reeves, 37 Fla. L. Weekly D1381a (Fla. 1st DCA June 13, 2012)

 

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Finance & Banking Updates, Residential Real Estate Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Trenam Kemker | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »