Lance Armstrong Confession Injects New Life Into Insurance-Related Arbitration Dispute


Here is a cautionary tale for insurers with respect to the enforceability of settlement agreements.

SCA Promotions, Inc. (SCA), a Dallas-based company that offers prize indemnification insurance to athletes, has been in a continuous battle with Lance Armstrong since his doping allegations emerged in 2005.  Most recently, on October 29, 2013, a Texas arbitration panel agreed to hear SCA’s attempt to recoup $7.5 million in bonus prize money, attorneys’ fees, and interest it paid to Armstrong for winning the 2004 Tour de France.  This panel’s decision essentially reopens a settled matter given that, in 2006, SCA agreed both to pay the $7.5 million to Armstrong, and not attempt to challenge the award.

Due to the previous settlement agreement between SCA and Armstrong, Armstrong claimed that the arbitration panel lacked jurisdiction to hear this matter.  SCA countered, and the panel agreed, that Armstrong’s January 2013 confession to the use of illicit substances and blood transfusions should allow for SCA to reverse its prior stipulation and challenge the payment.  The panel voted 2-1 that it had, and would exercise, jurisdiction to determine a final award, if any, to resolve all issues between Armstrong and SCA.  It is unclear how or if this arbitration decision will affect a separate lawsuit between the parties in which SCA is attempting to recoup approximately $12 million it paid to Armstrong in bonus prize money throughout his career.

Although the 2006 settlement agreement was binding, this decision demonstrates how a fully-executed settlement agreement and release still may be voided by an arbitration panel, as it is not necessarily bound by substantive rules of law.  Essentially, the arbitration panel’s decision gave SCA the proverbial second bite at the apple with respect to its attempt to recoup the $7.5 million.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sedgwick LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Sedgwick LLP on:

JD Supra Readers' Choice 2016 Awards
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.