Last Month at the Federal Circuit - February 2011

more+
less-

In this issue: Federal Circuit Remands for Decision on Vacatur Motion; Federal Circuit Rejects 25 Percent Rule of Thumb for Calculating Damages; Single Embodiment Is Sufficient Evidence to Show Commercial Success; Petition to Transfer from the Eastern District of Texas to the Western District of Washington Granted; Award of Attorneys’ Fees Improper Where Proposed Claim Construction Is Not Objectively Baseless; Federal Jurisdiction Proper in a State Law Malpractice Action Where Patent Infringement Is a “Necessary Element” of the State Law Claim; The Fine Line Between Reading a Claim in Light of the Specification and Importing a Limitation from the Specification into the Claim; Federal Circuit Defines “Use” Under § 271(a) for System and Apparatus Claims Involving Multiple Actors; and Court Affirms Finding of Obviousness Where Elements of Claims Are Found in Combination of Prior Art References.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

more+
less-

Finnegan on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×