In this Issue:
*Term of Degree “Readily” Not Indefinite If Patent Supplies Standard for Measuring Scope
*Court Affirms Dismissal of a DJ Complaint Based on Absence of an Actual Controversy
*Court Affirms SJ That Google’s Online Advertising System Did Not Infringe
*Plaintiff University Fails to Provide Clear and Convincing Evidence of Joint Inventorship Where the Parties’ Respective Stories Are “Equally Plausible”
*Court Affirms Board’s Finding of Adequate Written Description and Reverses Board’s Finding of Failure to Establish Actual Reduction to Practice in an Interference
*Court Affirms Board’s Interference Ruling After Finding Claims Satisfied Written Description Requirement
*Federal Circuit Clarifies That the Rule Against Reissue Recapture Applies to Subject Matter Surrendered During Prosecution of Related Patent Applications
*Recordation of Patent Assignment at the PTO Created a Presumption of Validity of the Assignment
*Claims to a Controller with Multiple Input Members Were Not Supported by Earlier Application That Described a Controller with a Single Input Member
*Confusion Is Likely Between the Marks “ML” and “ML MARK LEES” for Identical Goods
Please see full publication below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.