Law Professor Blows the Whistle on his Colleagues

by Charles E. Rounds, Jr.
Contact

Professor Brian Tamanaha’s new book, Failing Law Schools,  does a good job of explaining why borrowing to obtain a lower tier law school education has become a bad deal for all too many, but fails even to acknowledge the sadder fact that to enter most any American law school nowadays is to enter an intellectual wasteland.

When a witness makes an admission that is against his personal interest, that admission is given particular deference by the Court. It must be true or he wouldn’t have said it. In Failing Law Schools, Professor Brian Z. Tamanaha of the Washington University School of Law has spun out an extended and detailed admission, one that is sure to bring down upon him the wrath of his colleagues from the Atlantic to the Pacific, from Canada to Mexico.

The admission is that if one enrolls in a lower tier law school with the idea that one is going to get a good law job afterwards, one is going to be in for a rude awakening. Many recent law graduates are driving taxis or working at Starbucks with no foreseeable prospect of paying off their student loans. In other words the price is way too high if it is a good job one is after. And the cause of this sorry state of affairs? The untrammeled greed and union laborer mentality of law school academics, of which Prof. Tamahaha has been a beneficiary over the years, as have I.

Failing Law Schools, however, doesn’t tell the full story of why law school nowadays is generally a bad deal. The rest of the story is that while the law student is piling up all this debt he really isn’t learning very much. And I don’t mean that he is not gaining any meaningful law practice experience. Both Prof. Tamanaha and I agree that the only way to get that is to actually get out and practice in the real world over an extended period of time. No. What I mean is that gone are the days when it could be said that the law student will at least come away with a thorough grounding in the basic anatomy of the Anglo-American legal tradition.

To make matters worse, the pedagogical environment of the American law school nowadays more closely resembles that of a Montessori school classroom than Prof. Kingfield’s in The Paper Chase. In Bricks Without Straw, an article published by the National Association of Scholars, I explain why legal education has degraded to such a state. In other words I tell the rest of the story. The article is posted on JDSUPRA:   http://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/bricks-without-straw-the-sorry-state-of-58384/.

In no way is Prof. Tamanaha correct when he asserts in an aside, its self-evidence apparently warranting no factual support, that the first year of law school is “uniquely demanding,” that it is a legendary ordeal involving “daily classroom grilling.” If that were only the case. Those days are long gone as I explain in Bricks Without Straw.

But back to Failing Law Schools. As Prof. Tamanaha sees it, and I agree with him in this regard, the root of the economic problem is that the three academic constituencies within the legal academy, the doctrinal faculty, the in-house clinical faculty, and the legal writing instructors “have repeatedly worked…[their]…self interest into accreditation standards.”

The three-year in residence requirement, generous faculty compensation packages, tenure or quasi-tenure are just a few of the by-products of these market distorting machinations. And still newly-minted law graduates these days can’t write and don’t know the law’s basic anatomy. “We teach less and get paid more than other professors, and we earn more than most lawyers, yet we complain about being underpaid relative to lawyers.”  The federal loan program, “though well intended, has devastating consequences for many students.”  Think three trade unions fighting over the spoils of an enterprise that is a shell of its former self and whose intellectual product has degraded to a state of mediocrity and irrelevance.

In Bad Sociology, Not Law, a piece posted by The Pope Center, I explained why the clinical and legal writing faculties deserve a share of the blame for this sorry pedagogical state of affairs. As a follow-up, Failing Law Schools does a good job of explaining why their actions also have contributed to the economic binds that the law schools and their newly-minted graduates now find themselves in. Here is a link to the Bad Sociology, Not Law piece: http://www.popecenter.org/commentaries/article.html?id=2281.

If all this were not bad enough, law schools across the country were caught in 2011 advertising “sky-high employment rates and triple-digit salaries for recent graduates.” In other words student grades and their personal accomplishments are not the only things that the denizens of the legal academy have been inflating.

What then is to be done?  Prof.Tamanaha is vague. Essentially he suggests that the legal academy needs some industrial-grade belt tightening and general personal sacrificing. More hours in the classroom. Less frivolous scholarship. That sort of tweaking around the edges.

My suggestions are far more radical. If I were all-powerful, I would take the responsibility for educating real world lawyers out of the hands of the American universities and put it back in the hands of the practitioner-scholars, where it had been lodged at the beginning of the 19th century. The sine qua non for being a law school instructor would be many years of real- world practice experience on the civil side of the law. Are there any professors of surgery out there who have never performed an operation on a real human being?  I doubt it. I certainly hope that is not the case.

My model law instructor would be the great practitioner-scholar John Chipman Gray (1839-1915), who was simultaneously practicing law full-time at Ropes and Gray, the law firm he co-founded, and teaching full-time at The Harvard Law School. For more on Prof. Gray, see my Bricks Without Straw. And I would make law schools for-profit institutions. As to those who, for whatever reason, are interested in getting a law PhD, or whose predilections are multidisciplinary, I would direct them to the American university and wish them good luck.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Charles E. Rounds, Jr., Suffolk University Law School | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Charles E. Rounds, Jr.
Contact
more
less

Suffolk University Law School on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!