Lawyers Poaching Clients Could Face Suit in NJ

more+
less-

In a tough economy, businesses often go to great lengths to generate new business. However, for New Jersey lawyers, client poaching could land you in hot water.

Poaching Clients Could Face Suit in NJ

The New Jersey Supreme Court recently ruled that New Jersey lawyers could pursue tortious interference claims against their peers in some rare situations. The case, Nostrame v. Santiago, A-40-11, clarifies that plaintiffs in these cases must allege specific wrongful conduct, including misrepresentations, fraud or ethical violations, in order to sustain a suit.

In Nostrame v. Santiago, Frank J. Nostrame, Esq. was retained to pursue a medical malpractice claim. After filing the complaint, Nostrame received a letter from the client discharging him as her counsel and instructing him to turn over her file to Mazie Slater Katz & Freeman, LLC (Mazie Slater). After the case was ultimately settled for $1.2 million, Nostrame filed a lawsuit for a part of the legal fee claiming that Mazie Slater had tortiously interfered with his contract with the client by inducing her to discharge him.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Business Organization Updates, Firm Marketing Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Donald Scarinci, Scarinci Hollenbeck | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »