On November 8, 2011, the California Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Brinker Restaurant v. Superior Court (Hohnbaum), 165 Cal.App. 4th 25 (2008), to determine whether, under California law, a company may simply "provide" employees with the opportunity for a meal period, or whether it must affirmatively "ensure" that those meal periods are taken.
In October 2008, the California Supreme Court made the decision to review Brinker Restaurant v. Superior Court (Hohnbaum), 165 Cal.App. 4th 25 (2008). Now, at long last, with the appointment of Justice Goodwin Liu, the Court has a full panel and will hear oral arguments in Brinker on November 8, 2011.
The issue – of which all Californians are probably aware – is: May a company simply "provide" employees with the opportunity for a meal period, or must it affirmatively "ensure" that those meal periods are taken? Unless post-hearing briefing is ordered, we will have an answer by February 6, 2012 (90 days following submission at oral argument).
Please see full alert below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Administrative Law Updates, Labor & Employment Law Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© FordHarrison | Attorney Advertising