Legal Alert: Back to Brinker: California's Meal Period Riddle Will Soon Be Answered

more+
less-

On November 8, 2011, the California Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Brinker Restaurant v. Superior Court (Hohnbaum), 165 Cal.App. 4th 25 (2008), to determine whether, under California law, a company may simply "provide" employees with the opportunity for a meal period, or whether it must affirmatively "ensure" that those meal periods are taken.

In October 2008, the California Supreme Court made the decision to review Brinker Restaurant v. Superior Court (Hohnbaum), 165 Cal.App. 4th 25 (2008). Now, at long last, with the appointment of Justice Goodwin Liu, the Court has a full panel and will hear oral arguments in Brinker on November 8, 2011.

The issue – of which all Californians are probably aware – is: May a company simply "provide" employees with the opportunity for a meal period, or must it affirmatively "ensure" that those meal periods are taken? Unless post-hearing briefing is ordered, we will have an answer by February 6, 2012 (90 days following submission at oral argument).

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Administrative Agency Updates, Labor & Employment Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© FordHarrison | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »