Legal Alert: Ohio Supreme Court Limits Public Policy Wrongful Discharge Claims


The Ohio Supreme Court recently issued a decision clarifying that at-will employees in Ohio do not have a common-law action for wrongful discharge merely because they were discharged while receiving workers? compensation benefits. See Bickers v. W&S Life Insurance Co., 2007 Ohio 6751 (Ohio 2007). This decision limits the Court?s 2003 decision in Coolidge v. Riverdale Local School Dist., which had been interpreted to permit an employee to sue an employer for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy when the employee is discharged for non-retaliatory reasons while receiving workers? compensation benefits. Under Bickers, at-will employees are limited to filing claims for retaliatory discharge under the Ohio Workers? Compensation Act.

See full alert for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© FordHarrison | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.