In Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC, a federal judge in the Southern District of New York recently held that Dodd-Frank’s whistleblower protections can extend to employees who do not qualify as statutory “whistleblowers.” Although federal appellate courts have yet to weigh in, the Murray decision reflects a growing judicial consensus in federal district courts that a company’s internal whistleblowers may be protected from retaliation even if they never report their concerns to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act created a series of new incentives for “whistleblowers” — defined as individuals who provide “information relating to a violation of the securities laws to the [SEC].” Among these incentives is a broad anti-retaliation provision that prohibits employers from discharging, demoting, suspending, threatening, harassing, or otherwise discriminating against a “whistleblower” for assisting or sharing information with the SEC—or for “making disclosures that are required or protected” under the securities laws.
The plaintiff in Murray had worked as a senior strategist for a securities firm, where his duties included preparing reports about mortgage-backed securities for current and potential clients. The plaintiff claimed that he had been fired after complaining to his supervisors about allegedly being pressured to produce false and misleading research reports, in what he believed to be a violation of SEC regulations.
Please see full alert below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.