Legal Alert: Supreme Court Holds That Damages Stipulation Cannot Bind Class and Defeat Federal Jurisdiction

The Supreme Court unanimously held yesterday in Standard Fire Ins. Co. v. Knowles , 2013 WL 1104735, that a damages - limiting stipulation by the named plaintiff in a putative class action is not binding on absent class members before class certification and therefore cannot defeat removal of a class action under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA).

Knowles is a proposed class action filed in an Arkansas state court claiming that Standard Fire Insurance Company unlawfully failed to include general contractor fees (for overhead and profit) when it settled homeowners’ insurance claims. In the complaint, and in an attached affidavit, the named plaintiff stipulated that he “will not at any time during this case . . . seek damages for the class . . . in excess of $5 million in the aggregate.” (Slip op. at 2.) The district court concluded that the stipulation was enforceable and binding on the class and defeated CAFA jurisdiction. The Eighth Circuit declined to hear an interlocutory appeal under the CAFA procedure.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  Amount in Controversy, CAFA, Class Action, Damages, Jurisdiction, SCOTUS

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »