This is an action for patent infringement by David Tropp, inventor of an innovative system for making airline luggage inspection secure while accommodating the needs of the traveler, in which dual access locks that can be opened by the luggage owner and the TSA are provided to consumers, as described and claimed in U.S. Patent Nos. 7,021,537 (“the ’537 patent”) and 7,036,728 (“the ’728 patent”).
Tropp submitted this letter in opposition to defendants' request for leave by the defendants to make a summary judgment motion based on 28 U.S.C. sec. 1948. They argued that the alleged infringement was committed not by them, who manufacture and sell the locks in question, but by the Transportation Security Administration; or, alternatively, that their infringement was pursuant to the TSA's "authorization." Under 28 U.S.C. § 1498, if the government or its contractor is the actual infringer, and the contractor is authorized to take infringing actions, all claims must be brought in the U.S. Court of Claims.
We argued that defendants' understanding of the law and its application here was incorrect.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Civil Remedies Updates, Intellectual Property Updates
Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Motions for Summary Judgment/Adjudication | Federal, 2nd Circuit, New York | United States
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Ronald Coleman, Goetz Fitzpatrick LLP | Attorney Advertising