There’s a dust up occurring between the City of Los Angeles and the Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District (“Great Basin”). What’s the dust up about?
Yes, even something as naturally occurring and seemingly benign as dust can be a pollutant when it impacts the quality of water sources used by consumers and business.
This murky battle is nothing to sneeze at. The current dispute has its origins in the 1980’s, back when dust wasn’t what it used to be, or at least it was less expensive to clean up. That’s when the City of Los Angeles entered an agreement with the California Air Resources Board to pay for pollution control measures related to dust that first began to surface a century ago when Los Angeles began diverting water from Owens Lake via an aqueduct more than 200 miles long.
According to the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power (“LADWP”), via its press release, Great Basin is abusing its power to issue orders and fee assessments. The City, after paying more than $1.2 billion in pollution control efforts to Great Basin over the last decade, is putting its foot down and challenging the current assessments, filing suit on October 12, 2012 in US District Court against Great Basin, the California Air Resources Board, and Federal regulators (i.e. Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Land Management).
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.