Magistrate Recommends Denying Motion To Dismiss Based On Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction

Morris James LLP
Contact

Forest Laboratories, Inc. et al. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC, C.A. No. 14-508 LPS, February 26, 2015.

Burke, M.J.  Magistrate recommends denying defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction in a Report and Recommendation.

Defendant moves to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction in this ANDA litigation in light of the decision in Daimler.  In one other Delaware case the court found that compliance with Delaware’s registration statute did not constitute consent to personal jurisdiction.  However, Judge Stark came to the opposite conclusion in another case.  An appeal is pending on that point.  This judge agrees with the reasoning in the previous opinion from Judge Stark and recommends denying the motion to dismiss.  The magistrate further notes that the parties submitted several notices of supplemental authority which go beyond citing supplemental authority and therefore were in violation of District of Delaware Local Rule 7.1.2(b).  He therefore did not consider those submissions.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morris James LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morris James LLP
Contact
more
less

Morris James LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide