Mainebiz Real Estate Insider – Protecting the Penny Wise in a Lease


Some penny wise clients resist advice to get real estate out of their own individual names, opening themselves to unnecessary risk. Fortunate clients, who have not met the “trial bar” up close and personal, sometimes still won’t make the change after receipt of appropriate advice. To be fair and respectful, some of these fortunate clients have collected a great many pennies over the years using a penny wise approach to business and are very successful doing it their way.

However, even for the client, declining good advice, relief can still be available in a lease. A typical limitation of liability clause in a lease states: “The tenant agrees to look solely to the landlord’s interest in the building for recovery of any judgment from landlord, it being understood and agreed that the landlord is not personally liable for any such judgment.”

This language needs an adjustment, if the property is owned individually, and clearly it isn’t providing protection against all claims. The tenant could argue that the clause is unfair in that the clause gives the tenant no remedy for its losses in the event the property is highly leveraged or there is no equity in the property.

For those landlords who hold property in their individual names, one can legitimately argue, that if he or she owned the property in a single purpose entity (LLC, LLP, Trust, etc.) the individuals who own the interests in a landlord entity, would be protected in the event of a loss. The landlord argues: why then should the individual landlord have less protection, if for historical, tax or other reasons the landlord chooses to own the property in his or her own name or in a general partnership rather than a single purpose entity.

It is important for landlords to hold firm on this issue. Landlords don’t want their personal assets subject to a claim from a wronged tenant. In addition, if a landlord entity owns several properties, it is inherently unfair that all of the other properties held by that entity be subject to claims of a wronged tenant who has claims related to one property.

One compromise might be to expand the clause to give the tenant the right to pursue net insurance proceeds or to give the tenant the right to pursue injunctive relief against a landlord as long as that action does not involve the personal liability of the landlord. There are still ways in each area of work we do, to protect or partially protect the client even the informed penny wise client.


Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Bernstein Shur | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.