Mandatory arbitration costs are properly assessed to law firm

more+
less-

In Roldan v. Callahan & Blaine, the California Court of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District decided a unique case illustrating California’s public policy of ensuring a litigant’s access to the justice system. The case arose out of a “mandatory arbitration clause” contained in the law firm’s retainer agreement with its clients.

The plaintiffs hired a lawyer to represent them in litigation. The clients were elderly and had limited resources. Prior to trial, the lawyer needed assistance and hired the law firm of Callahan & Blaine (“Callahan”) to work as co-counsel. Callahan’s retainer agreement contained a mandatory arbitration provision. Subsequently, the clients agreed to settle the case. However, they alleged Callahan used undue influence to obtain their consent.

The clients subsequently sued Callahan based on their assertions of undue pressure. The complaint filed on their behalf alleged that the plaintiffs received sums “far less than the real value of the case.” Callahan successfully moved to compel arbitration at the trial court level. The plaintiffs then contended that they could not afford to arbitrate the case and requested an order requiring the law firm to pay the costs of arbitration. The trial court denied that request.

The court of appeal reversed the trial court’s decision.  The court referenced California’s public policy of ensuring that all litigants have access to the justice system without regard to economic means. The court of appeal concluded that Callahan’s arbitration provision did not contain any protections to ensure the clients would have equal access to the justice system. The court of appeal directed the trial court to calculate the cost of arbitration, and to provide two alternatives to the law firm. The trial court was directed to allow the firm to either pay the reasonable arbitration costs for the plaintiffs or to waive the right to arbitrate.

 

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.
×
Loading...
×
×