Man’s Best Friend Gets No Love from New Jersey Supreme Court

more+
less-

Watching a pet die can be a devastating experience, but does it legally qualify as emotional distress? New Jersey recently joined a number of other states in ruling that these emotional distress claims are strictly limited to human relationships.

“Although we recognize that many people form close bonds with their pets, we conclude that those bonds do not rise to the level of close familial relationship or intimate, marital-type bond,” the Supreme Court held in McDougall v. Lamm.

The facts of the case are disturbing for any pet owner. Plaintiff Joyce McDougall was walking her maltipoo, Angel, when a large dog belonging to defendant Charlot Lamm ran out and grabbed McDougall’s dog by the neck. The larger dog picked up Angel and shook it several times before dropping it. Angel ultimately died. In her lawsuit, McDougall alleged that, as a result of witnessing the dog’s death, she suffered significant emotional distress for which she should be entitled to damages.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Donald Scarinci, Scarinci Hollenbeck | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

Scarinci Hollenbeck on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×