ART+COM Innovationpool GmbH v. Google Inc., C.A. No. 14-217 – RGA, June 26, 2015.

Andrews, J. The court considers 14 terms from the patent-in-suit. Oral argument took place on May 12, 2015.

The court construed the following terms:

1. Centrally storing the data for the field of view;
2. Image resolutions
3. The co-ordinates of the data
4. Quadrant tree
5. Octant tree
6. Polygonal grid model
7. Requesting data for the field of view from at least one of the plurality of spatially distributed data sources
8. Space-related data
9. Plurality of spatially distributed data sources
10. Determining the data and/or the co-ordinates of the data in terms of  a new co-ordinate system/ determining the data or the co-ordinates of the data in terms of a new co-ordinate system
11. Representing the data for the field of view in a pictorial representation having one or more sections
12. Dividing each of the one or more sections having image resolutions below a desired image resolution into plurality of smaller sections, requesting     higher resolution space-related      data for each of the smaller sections
13. Repeating step (f), dividing the sections into smaller sections,  until every section has the desired image resolution or no higher image     resolution data is available
14. Wherein the space-related data are provided with references to  thematically adjacent data