Mary Carter Decision Is Upheld By The Supreme Court Of Canada

more+
less-

In my article April 2011, titled Who Knew That Mary Carter Was Involved In Construction Law?, I reported about the decision in Aecon Buildings v. Stephenson Engineering Limited. In that decision, the Ontario Court of Appeal stayed an owner's claim because of the non-disclosure of a Mary Carter agreement.

The Supreme Court of Canada has recently dismissed an application for leave to appeal from that decision. Justice Binnie wrote the decision denying leave and he answers the "importance" question. Accordingly, the ruling by the Court of Appeal will stand as good law across Canada on this issue.

As a result, the comments in my article of April 3, 2011 are now under-lined:

"This decision is a reminder of the drastic remedies available to the Courts if litigation is conducted unfairly" and the parties must be scrupulous to ensure that Mary Carter and other similar agreements affecting the conduct of litigation are immediately disclosed.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Thomas Heintzman, Arbitration Place | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

Arbitration Place on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×