Massachusetts Appeals Court Rules on Burden of Proof for Lien Claimants


Similar to many other states, the Massachusetts lien law has what may be considered a "cram-down" provision, which restricts the value of a lien in certain circumstances. A subcontractor or vendor lien claimant cannot obtain a lien for an amount greater than what is owed to the party above it in the contract line-up, at the time notice of its lien is given to the owner.1 If no money is due from the owner to the prime contractor when the subcontractor files a lien notice, the subcontractor's lien is effectively capped at the amount due, which may be zero.

But who has to prove how much was owed at the key point in time? That was the issue decided this week by the Massachusetts Appeals Court in National Lumber v. Inman.2

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Civil Remedies Updates, General Business Updates, Construction Updates, Residential Real Estate Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Duane Morris LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »