McAfee & Taft RegLINC - April 2012: Halliburton evidence on Deepwater Horizon

more+
less-

By Chris Paul

BP accused Halliburton of destroying evidence that could be important in the litigation over responsibility for the Deepwater Horizon oil spill (In re: Oil Spill, E.D. La., No. 2:10-md-2179, 12/5/11). BP questioned whether a cement slurry that contractor Halliburton pumped into the Macondo well was strong enough to do its job and asked the court to impose sanctions on Halliburton for discarding cement that Halliburton tested in the weeks following the blowout. BP also asked for an order compelling Halliburton “to deliver to a third party forensic electronic firm reasonably acceptable to BP the computer that Halliburton used to produce proprietary 3D modeling results that it now inexplicably claims are gone.” Halliburton denied the allegations. 

 

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© McAfee & Taft | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.
×
Loading...
×