McAfee & Taft RegLINC - April 2012: Nanomaterial regulation By Chris Paul


[author: Chris Paul]

Agencies do not have consensus-based standards to measure nanoparticles, cannot interpret the results of toxicity tests, and do not have agreed-upon names for some nanoparticles, according to Maria Doa, director of the EPA’s Chemical Control Division, who spoke at a nanotechnology workshop organized by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) in December 2011.

The American Chemistry Council’s Nanotechnology Panel said companies need standards to support efforts to test the safety of their products and to protect workers. Workshop participants discussed reasons for the failure to have standards, largely blamed on broad use of the term “nanotechnology.” That word is used in science, engineering and technology dealing with material between approximately 1 nanometer and 100 nanometers. Some workshop attendees indicated that many different types of standards will be needed for diverse applications of nanomaterials.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© McAfee & Taft | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


McAfee & Taft on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.