Parker v. Bank of America, N.A. et al

Memorandum and Order - Injunction Granted - ITPB Claim Allowed - HAMP

more+
less-

Potentially groundbreaking Memorandum and Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. (See pages 7-18).

Although several claims were dismissed, notably, Plaintiff's breach of contract claim as an ITPB of HAMP SPA Agreements was allowed to go forward as in Marques v. Wells Fargo (USDC, SDC, 3:09-cv-01985-L-RBB).

If more Courts adopt this line of reasoning it could save the HAMP program by giving Banks a reason to comply with the regulations. This in turn could save hundreds of thousands of homeowners who were intended by Treasury to benefit from HAMP, but who are instead languishing in a morass of paperwork, or worse, giving up and falling into foreclosure.

Although non-binding, this is an important decision for consumer advocates to cite and adopt across the Country as persuasive authority.

-Atty. John F. Skinner, III

Counsel for the Plaintiff

Consumer Advocate

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Consumer Protection Updates, Residential Real Estate Updates

Reference Info:Decision | State, 1st Circuit, Massachusetts | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© John Skinner, Skinner, Rivard & Siekmann | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »