The Doe Client was a nonparty witness to the underlying class action securities litigation pending in the District of Maryland against Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc. (“Jos. A. Bank”). Jos. A. Bank served a subpoena issued by the District of Massachusetts seeking, among other things, the Doe Client’s identity. The Doe Client moved to quash the subpoena on various grounds, including by asserting a First Amendment right to remain anonymous. After Jos. A. Bank’s counsel obtained the Doe Client’s identity in a sealed deposition in Massachusetts, Jos. A. Bank moved in the District of Maryland to unseal the deposition transcript. The District of Maryland ordered the Doe Client’s identity partially unsealed and the Doe Client appealed that ruling to the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed.
Published decision: Lefkoe v. Jos A. Bank Clothiers, Inc., 577 F.3d 240 (4th Cir. 2009).
I prepared all initial drafts of all court papers filed by the Doe Client in this matter, including in the Fourth Circuit (Case No. 08-2059), the District of Maryland (Case No. 06-cv-01892), and the District of Massachusetts (Case No. 08-mc-10089).
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Privacy Updates, Securities Updates
Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Discovery Motions | Federal, 1st Circuit, Massachusetts | United States
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Marie Scheibert | Attorney Advertising