This Memorandum of Law was submitted in opposition to Defendants’ Cross-Motion for an Order granting Summary Judgment seeking an order that VTL §388 should be found unconstitutional. As stated herein and in the Affirmation of Kenneth S. Fink (also filed with jdsupra.com) in opposition to said Cross-Motion, VTL §388 has repeatedly been held to be constitutional and the Cross-Motion should be denied in its entirety.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Published In:
Constitutional Law Updates, Insurance Updates, Personal Injury Updates
Reference Info:
Legal Memoranda: Motions for Summary Judgment/Adjudication |
State, 2nd Circuit, New York |
United States
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Kenneth Fink, Cheriff & Fink, P.C. | Attorney Advertising
