Melnichenko v. Dashosh

MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

more+
less-

This Memorandum of Law was submitted in opposition to Defendants’ Cross-Motion for an Order granting Summary Judgment seeking an order that VTL §388 should be found unconstitutional. As stated herein and in the Affirmation of Kenneth S. Fink (also filed with jdsupra.com) in opposition to said Cross-Motion, VTL §388 has repeatedly been held to be constitutional and the Cross-Motion should be denied in its entirety.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Constitutional Law Updates, Insurance Updates, Personal Injury Updates

Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Motions for Summary Judgment/Adjudication | State, 2nd Circuit, New York | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Kenneth Fink, Cheriff & Fink, P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »