Flannery v. Singer Asset Financial Company

Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Continuance to Oppose Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment


This memorandum addresses the propriety of granting a continuance for the plaintiff to respond to defendant's motion for summary judgment where the plaintiff had failed to initiate any discovery for over two years, it was undisputed that the statute of limitations barred the plaintiff's claims, and the plaintiff's tolling defense is not properly at issue because defendant failed to respond to a request to revise the defense.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, General Business Updates

Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Motions for Summary Judgment/Adjudication | State, 2nd Circuit, Connecticut | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Aviva Cuyler, JD Supra, LLC | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »