Guggenheim Capital v. Toumei

Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for an Appeal Bond

more+
less-

Plaintiffs in this trademark default judgment case seek to eliminate the appeal by defendants, whom we came to represent for post-trial proceedings, by having the court impose a $100,000 bond as a condition of continuing their appeal -- despite the court having earlier authorized the defendants to proceed in forma pauperis.

The motion was denied (see related document).

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Business Torts Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Civil Remedies Updates, Intellectual Property Updates

Reference Info:Legal Memoranda: Post-Trial Motions | Federal, 2nd Circuit, New York | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ronald Coleman, Goetz Fitzpatrick LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »