Minnesota Government Update - April 29, 2011


In the midst of nearly around the clock work on policy and budget bills, the Legislature nonetheless took up two highly controversial bills this past week. Here’s an overview of the week that was and the forecast for next week --

Constitutional Amendment on Marriage

Three Republican Senators introduced a constitutional amendment that would allow Minnesotans the opportunity to vote on the definition of marriage in the 2012 election. Senators Limmer (R-Maple Grove), Hann (R-Eden Prairie), and Gazelka (R-Brainerd) want to ask voters to define marriage as solely between one man and one woman in Minnesota. In a hearing on Friday that allowed one hour for proponent testimony, one hour for opponent testimony, and one hour for committee discussion, many religious and community leaders took the opportunity to voice their opinion on the issue. Senator Hann stated in a press release, “I believe that it is best to let the people decide rather than a small group of legislators in St. Paul. By putting this definition of marriage on the ballot, we can ensure that this decision will accurately reflect the values that Minnesotans believe in.”

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:


Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A. on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.