Minor Problems In Environmental Impact Report Are Not Prejudicial Defects

A recent appellate case addressed the issue of minor problems and deficiencies in an Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) and whether they were prejudicial errors that amounted to defects in the approval process required for a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). [Mount Shasta Bioregional Ecology Center v. County of Siskiyou , 3rd District Court of Appeal (9/26/12, published 10/18/12)]

Specifically, the case involved a private party who bought a wood products manufacturing facility, converted it, then sought approval for a biomass-fueled cogeneration power plant so that heat generated in the facility’s boiler could be used for both manufacturing and the generation of electricity for resale.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Administrative Agency Updates, Business Organization Updates, General Business Updates, Environmental Updates, Government Contracting Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Peter S. Bauman - Senior Commercial Litigation Attorney Callahan & Blaine, (714) 241-4444 (office) / (949) 842-1720 (mobile) | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »