Money Back - Guaranteed? Part II - No Implied Term In Tenant Break Option

more+
less-
more+
less-
Explore:  Appeals Leases UK

The Court of Appeal has overturned a decision of the High Court which implied a term into a lease by which a tenant could recoup "overpaid" sums after exercising its break option.

The High Court's original decision did not entitle tenants to apportion payments due before the break date. However, the introduction of the implied term created a degree of uncertainty for landlords and tenants. Was this a term to be implied into all leases or just that lease?

Effect of the decision -

The Court of Appeal's decision reinforces best practice:

(1) If parties want to be able to claim back "overpaid sums", then they should ensure the lease includes apportionment or recoup provisions that entitle them to do so.

(2) Parties exercising break options should follow the terms of the break option to the letter.

(3) If you are in any doubt as to what is required to exercise a break option and/or your rights after the break date, seek specialist legal advice.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  Appeals, Leases, UK

Published In: Civil Remedies Updates, General Business Updates, Commercial Real Estate Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© DLA Piper | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »