More On Say-On-Pay Voting


In yesterday’s post, I make the point that the Dodd-Frank Act requires issuers to include a resolution in their proxy statement regarding the frequency of say-on-pay advisory votes. Because the vote on this resolution is advisory only, some issuers appear to be taking the position that they don’t have to apply the “normal” rules to determine whether the resolution is adopted. Moreover, it is very tempting to invoke a plurality voting rule (i.e., the choice that receives the most vote wins) because the shareholders must be allowed to instruct their proxies to vote on 1, 2, or 3 years or abstain.

However, the fact that a resolution is nonbinding does not make the question of whether it passes irrelevant. Just ask any proponent of a nonbinding shareholder resolution if they care whether the resolution passes. Furthermore, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s proxy rules require issuers to disclose the vote required for approval of matters presented.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Allen Matkins on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.