S&L moved for an order awarding its costs, including attorneys’ fees, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 68, which provides that “(d) If the judgment that the offeree finally
obtains is not more favorable than the unaccepted offer, the offeree must pay the costs incurred after the offer was made.” This motion was based on an offer of judgment initially transmitted by S&L on June 13, 2008 and reiterated upon its rejection on June 20, 2008, which would have given plaintiffs a “more favorable” judgment than the one obtained – and at immensely less cost to the parties and the public.
On April 9, 2009, over the objection of plaintiffs, the Court ordered S&L to file a bill of costs.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Intellectual Property Updates, Civil Remedies Updates, Civil Procedure Updates
Legal Memoranda: Post-Trial Motions |
Federal, 9th Circuit, Arizona |
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Ronald Coleman, Goetz Fitzpatrick LLP | Attorney Advertising