A federal judge in Massachusetts last week denied the insurer’s motion to dismiss ERISA claims challenging retained asset account practices. Luitgaren v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, et al., No. 1:09-cv-11410-NG. (Please click here for the order.)
Plaintiff brought a putative class action on behalf of beneficiaries of ERISA life insurance plans who received their benefits from Defendants through retained asset accounts. Plaintiff alleged that Defendants breached fiduciary duties in violation of section 404(a) of ERISA (29 U.S.C. § 1104(a)) by investing retained assets for their own benefit. Plaintiff also alleged that the retained assets constituted plan assets within the meaning of ERISA and that Defendants’ investment of those assets constituted prohibited transactions in violation of section 406(b)(1) of ERISA (29 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)).
Please see full alert below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Civil Remedies Updates, Insurance Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP | Attorney Advertising