Motions to Strike Aren’t Necessary (or Are They)?

Explore:  Motion To Strike

In Apple Inc. v. SightSound Technologies LLC, CBM2013-00023, Paper 61 (April 2, 2014) the Board denied patent owner’s request for permission to file a motion to strike the Petitioner’s reply for new arguments not responsive to the arguments the patent owner made in its response, and to strike portions of Petitioner’s declaration for improperly containing legal argument.  In both instances, the Board said that in most cases it is capable of identifying and exclusing improper arguments and testimony.  However, merely asking for permision probably sensitized the Board to the issue.

Topics:  Motion To Strike

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Intellectual Property Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »