Multiple Courts Criticize EEOC Behavior In Class Cases

by BakerHostetler
Contact

Over the last 5 years, the EEOC has become increasingly aggressive in the bringing and pursuit of broad initiatives and, in particular, class litigation. Cynics can debate whether this springs from a desire to make a difference or one to bully employers through litigation costs into abandoning lawful practices that are not to its liking, but either way the Commission has been pursuing ever larger cases on questionable facts.

The EEOC, however, is not simply a federally funded plaintiff’s employment firm, but one charged with enforcing the nation’s civil rights laws that view litigation as a last resort. Further, while Congress has given the EEOC unique tools when that last resort proves necessary, it still must meet certain requirements including, naturally enough, having evidence that the employer actually did something wrong.

In the past two months, several courts have expressed concern over the EEOC’s current tactics and in particular its failure to conciliate charges under Title VII reasonably and in good faith and its bringing of expensive class action litigation based on little more than extrapolation of one individual circumstance across an entire workforce.

We’ve written earlier about some of these cases as they unfolded, but a few recent decisions are worthy of comment.

Most recently, in EEOC v. Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC, Case No. 4:11-CV-3425 (S.D. Tex., Oct. 2, 2013), the EEOC brought claims against the Bass Pro outdoor retailer, contending that it discriminated against minorities in its hiring practices. As an aside, even if you are not the outdoors type, their stores are practically destinations unto themselves with an astonishing array of products for campers, hikers, fishers, hunters and others that you may not have even dreamed of.

We commented previously on the court’s treatment of the EEOC’s efforts to combine a straight-forward discrimination claim with a pattern or practice claim. Unfortunately, the court later permitted part of the case to proceed, but the defendant then charged the EEOC with failing to conciliate in good faith under Title VII. Rather than defend its tactics during the conciliation process, the Commission moved the court for partial summary judgment based on its contention that the court had no power to review its good faith or the reasonableness of its conduct during conciliation.

The court viewed the Commission’s motion as raising mostly an issue of law, and methodically rejected its arguments. It reviewed Title VII’s history and noted the statute’s strong preference for “settling disputes, if possible, in an informal, noncoercive fashion.”  Occidental Life Ins. Co. v. EEOC, 432 U.S. 355, 368 (1977). It found that under the statute the EEOC was to act in a reasonable and responsive manner while conciliating a charge. More specifically, it found that the EEOC was required to (1) outline for the employer the basis for its belief that reasonable cause existed; (2) offer the employer the opportunity for voluntary compliance, and (3) “respond in a reasonable and flexible manner to the reasonable attitudes of the employer.” Citing EEOC v. Agro Distribution, LLC, 555 F.3d 462, 468 (5th Cir. 2009).

The court found that the EEOC’s arguments were proscribed by this binding authority, but also analyzed them separately and found they were without merit. The court reiterated that voluntary compliance was the preferred means of enforcement under Title VII and overruled the EEOC’s motion.

The district court’s decision was not only legally right, but good policy. The vast majority of employers want to run their businesses ethically and lawfully. Even in litigation, courts express a strong preference for amicable resolution of such claims, in part because the parties can fashion for themselves a better and more suitable resolution than one imposed by the court, and for the wise reason that the parties are willing to view their commitments more favorably if they were reached voluntarily than imposed by an outside court or agency.

While this case dealt with the commonsense and non-burdensome obligation to conciliate, other courts have been critical of the EEOC’s conduct in litigation, particularly when it files or pursues claims when it has no evidence of widespread discrimination. Less than two months ago, a federal district court described the EEOC’s arguments in a class-wide discrimination case challenging the employer’s use of criminal background checks as “laughable.” EEOC v. Freeman, Case No. RWT 09cv2573 (D. Md. Aug. 9, 2013).  We blogged that case on August 19, 2013.

Two weeks before that, in a case that is now in its seventh year, a district court again sanctioned the EEOC for pursuing class-wide sex discrimination claims against a trucking company without any evidence. EEOC v. CRST Van Expediting Inc., Case No. 07-CV-95-LRR (D. Iowa, Aug. 1, 2013). We blogged that case twice before, on March 21, 2012 (relating to the Eighth Circuit’s affirming the dismissal of most of the Commission’s claims) and on April 20, 2011 (the prior order for sanctions). In this instance, in well-written 40-page opinion, the court found the EEOC liable for $4.6 million in fees and costs.

The upshot?  Courts are coming to question the EEOC’s tactics in class litigation. Unfortunately, the Commission remains unrepentant, and continues to press claims as in the CRST case for years after it has become apparent it has no evidence. Hopefully, more courts will address these issues and ultimately force the Commission to adhere to its statutory mandate to attempt reasonable voluntary resolution of claims and to file suit only when it has good evidence and has done so.

The Bottom Line: The EEOC must attempt to resolve claims reasonably and in good faith and to commence suit only after those efforts have failed and it has competent evidence that the employer has actually committed the violation it is being charged with.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© BakerHostetler | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

BakerHostetler
Contact
more
less

BakerHostetler on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!