A split is developing among the intermediate Texas appellate courts on an issue important to civil trial lawyers and their clients: whether attorney fees must be included in the amount of security a judgment debtor must post to prevent execution on the judgment pending appeal.
Under former Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 24.2(a)(1), an appellant seeking to supersede a money judgment had to post security in “at least the amount of the judgment, interest for the estimated duration of the appeal, and costs.” House Bill 4, the 2003 tort-reform package, altered the amount of security required to supersede a money judgment by substituting “the amount of compensatory damages awarded in the judgment” for “the amount of the judgment.” The Texas Supreme Court amended Rule 24.2 accordingly.
Please see full article below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.