NAM Likely Headed For Court After SEC Denies Full Stay Of Conflict Minerals Rules

The SEC has denied NAM’s motion for a full stay of the conflict minerals rules.  As I indicated, it was somewhat of a hail Mary, but maybe a precondition to asking the court for relief.  Expect NAM et al to head for court soon as threatened.

The SEC did issue a partial stay, but there is no news here.  Basically it just implements Corporation Finance’s previously issued guidance.

Given that the court previously didn’t seem enamored with NAM and the other petitioners’ arguments, I’d say it’s an uphill battle for NAM et al.  But who knows, maybe Commissioners Gallagher and Piwowar will release a Second Joint Statement on the Conflict Minerals Decision or file an amicus brief or something.

Topics:  Conflict Mineral Rules, First Amendment, Manufacturers, NAM, SEC

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Civil Remedies Updates, General Business Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Securities Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Stinson Leonard Street - Dodd-Frank and the Jobs Act | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »