Negotiating Additional Insured Provisions in the Wake of the Deepwater Horizon Decision

more+
less-

Companies should re-examine their approach to additional insured provisions in their business contracts and insurance policies in light of the Fifth Circuit’s recent decision in In re Deepwater Horizon, 710 F.3d 338 (5th Cir. 2013).

The Claim -

Transocean Holdings, Inc., the drilling contractor to BP America Production Company at the Macondo Well, maintained liability coverage in the amount of $750 million at the time of the explosion and sinking of the Deepwater Horizon. BP asserted claims for insurance coverage as an additional insured under Transocean’s liability insurance policies for BP’s subsurface pollution liabilities.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  BP, Deepwater Horizon, Environmental Liability, Insurers, Terms and Conditions, Transocean

Published In: General Business Updates, Insurance Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© King & Spalding | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »