Negotiating Additional Insured Provisions in the Wake of the Deepwater Horizon Decision

King & Spalding
Contact

Companies should re-examine their approach to additional insured provisions in their business contracts and insurance policies in light of the Fifth Circuit’s recent decision in In re Deepwater Horizon, 710 F.3d 338 (5th Cir. 2013).

The Claim -

Transocean Holdings, Inc., the drilling contractor to BP America Production Company at the Macondo Well, maintained liability coverage in the amount of $750 million at the time of the explosion and sinking of the Deepwater Horizon. BP asserted claims for insurance coverage as an additional insured under Transocean’s liability insurance policies for BP’s subsurface pollution liabilities.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

King & Spalding
Contact
more
less

King & Spalding on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide