Nevada Ruling Suggests Lenders Wait Until Foreclosure Before Pursuing Guarantor Claim


In a recent case, the Supreme Court of Nevada agreed that a lender needed to wait until the completion of a foreclosure sale before making a deficiency claim against a guarantor. In Ken L. Templeton Family Trust, et al. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, et al., 2013 WL 476026 (Nev.), the court granted the issuance of a writ of mandamus, instructing the district court to vacate its order granting in part AG/ICC Willows Loan's motion for summary judgment and directing the district court to enter an order denying AG/ICC Willows Loan's motion for summary judgment.

In this case, borrower Carefree Willows, LLC went into default, and then filed for bankruptcy on the eve of foreclosure. While the bankruptcy was pending and before the foreclosure sale, lender Union Bank of California, N.A. ("Union Bank") filed a guaranty complaint for the full debt amount. District Judge Rob Bare granted summary judgment in favor of Union Bank as to liability and requested further briefing on the issue of damages. Guarantors Kenneth Templeton, the Templeton Family Trust and the Ken II Revocable Family Trust filed a writ of mandamus—essentially asking the court to vacate the summary judgment order—and reasoned that they were afforded anti-deficiency protections due to the filing of the complaint for the appointment of a receiver and enforcement of assignment and rents. Therefore, they contended that Union Bank was obligated to wait until the completion of the foreclosure sale before seeking its deficiency.

Although it appears to require a slight stretch in the interpretation of the Nevada statutes, the court agreed with the guarantors—adding that "the completion of the trustee's sale avoids any potential for double recovery [citing Walters v. District Court, 127 Nev. – (2011)] (recognizing the 'potential [for] double recovery when a guarantor waives the one-action rule pursuant to NRS 40.495(2)')."

While the lender may seek reconsideration of this ruling, a key takeaway is that in Nevada lenders may need to wait until after a foreclosure sale occurs before pursuing a deficiency claim against a guarantor.

For Further Information

If you have any questions about this Alert, please contact Meagen E. Leary, any member of the Business Reorganization and Financial Restructuring Practice Group or the attorney in the firm with whom you are regularly in contact.

Topics:  Anti-Deficiency Provisions, Borrowers, Foreclosure, Guarantors, Lenders, Summary Judgment, Writ of Mandamus

Published In: Finance & Banking Updates, Residential Real Estate Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Duane Morris LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »