New FTC Rules Address Electronically Stored Information and Privilege Issues


The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) promulgated revised rules concerning its investigative procedures, which take effect on November 9, 2012. Several changes concern the treatment of electronically stored information (ESI) and the protection of privileged materials. To a large degree, these new provisions mirror those found in civil proceedings.

Section 2.4 announces the FTC's investigational policy encouraging "the just and speedy resolution of investigations" and "cooperation in its investigations." This policy is comparable to Rule 1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and of The Sedona Conference's "Cooperation Proclamation," which applies to ESI discovery.

Section 2.7 addresses the use of compulsory process via civil investigative demand (CID) or subpoena. Paragraph (i) provides the FTC with the right to "require the production of documentary material, or electronic media or other tangible things, for inspection, copying, testing, or sampling." Paragraph (j) goes on to provide the manner and form of production of ESI. Respondents are required to follow all instructions provided by the FTC absent written permission to do otherwise. In cases where the FTC does not provide instructions, the respondent must produce ESI "in the form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form,"similar to the rule in civil proceedings.

When the FTC serves compulsory process, Section 2.7(k) mandates a meet and confer session prior to the filing of a petition to quash or limit. If the respondent wishes to discuss ESI-related issues, a person familiar with ESI systems and methods of retrieval must attend the conference.

Section 2.11 addresses the protection of privileged information. Paragraph (a) sets forth the categories of information that must be contained in a privilege log. Additionally, paragraph (b) requires another mandatory meet and confer session "to discuss and attempt to resolve any issues associated with the manner and form in which privilege or protection claims will be asserted." Logging requirements may be modified at the meet and confer. Paragraph (c) addresses inadvertent disclosures and waiver, and generally adopts the familiar test found in civil proceedings.

These revisions “are intended to promote fairness, transparency, and efficiency in all FTC investigations.” Their degree of success will largely depend on the participants embracing the meet and confer sessions and using those sessions to their best advantage.

The revised rules along with related commentary can be found here.


Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Miller Canfield | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.