New Game Plan: Federal Circuit Decision May Revive “Redskins” Trademarks

Federal Circuit finds that barring the registration of disparaging trademarks is unconstitutional, creating potential running room for the Washington Redskins.

An appeal of the 2014 decision to cancel the REDSKINS trademark is currently pending before the Fourth Circuit in Pro-Football Inc. v. Blackhorse. On December 22, 2015, the Federal Circuit ruled the longstanding ban on registering disparaging trademarks unconstitutional. The eight-judge In re Tam majority found Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act an impermissible restriction on speech in violation of the First Amendment. As a result, the Washington Redskins’ trademark registrations — cancelled on Section 2(a) disparagement grounds in 2014 — could be revived. Thus, the Federal Circuit’s In re Tam decision may help persuade the Fourth Circuit to rule in favor of the Redskins; if not, then the Supreme Court will likely be asked to weigh in on the resulting circuit split.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Latham & Watkins LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Latham & Watkins LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA NOW

  • Increased visibility
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing guidance

Latham & Watkins LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide