New Guidance on Imposing Personal Liability on Construction Firm Owners for Consumer Fraud Act claims

more+
less-

Earlier this year, the New Jersey Supreme Court in Allen v. V & A Brothers, Inc., 208 N.J. 114 (2011), ruled on the question of whether officers, owners, managers and/or employees of businesses providing services to consumers can be sued individually (alongside the company) and be held personally accountable for statutory violations under New Jersey’s Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. § 56:8-1 et seq. (“CFA”), and held that they could. This week, the New Jersey Appellate Division in Kort v. Renier Van Aswegen, 2011 WL 5137833 (App. Div. Nov. 1, 2011), provided some guidance on how that ruling will apply in construction cases.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Business Torts Updates, Civil Rights Updates, Construction Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Kevin O'Connor, Peckar & Abramson, P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »