New Jersey Court Reviews No-fault Law’s Language and Finds That There Was Nothing Preventing an Arbitrator From Hearing Common Law Fraud, Unjust Enrichment and RICO Claims

Marshall Dennehey
Contact

GEICO, et al. v. Caring Pain Management PC, et al., Case No. 2:22-cv-05017(BRM)(JSA) 2023 WL 3749984 (U.S.D.C. District of New Jersey May 31, 2023)

The defendants (a series of medical providers) filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the plaintiff’s common law fraud, unjust enrichment and RICO claims should be decided via arbitration. The court reviewed New Jersey’s No-Fault Law’s language and found that there was nothing that prevented an arbitrator from hearing these types of claims. This decision is currently being appealed by GEICO. There have been a series of recent opinions finding that non-Insurance Fraud Prevention (IFPA) claims are subject to arbitration. These opinions have failed to address how the arbitration forum, which has limited discovery mechanisms and 30-minute hearings, would be able to equitably facilitate these types of claims. If the courts continue to find along these lines, insurance carriers will be limited to only filing IFPA claims in juridical proceedings.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Marshall Dennehey | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Marshall Dennehey
Contact
more
less

Marshall Dennehey on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide