New York Court Affirmed Trial Court’s Denial of Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Held That a Party Should Be Afforded a Reasonable Opportunity to Conduct Discovery Prior to Determination of Motion for Summary Judgment

Marshall Dennehey
Contact

Cruz v. Fanoush 183 N.Y.S.3d 320 (Mem), (N.Y. App. Div. 2d Dept. 2023)

The plaintiff commenced a personal injury action following a motor vehicle accident. The plaintiff moved for summary judgment on the issues of liability and whether he sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102(d) as a result of the accident. The trial court denied the plaintiff’s motion.

The Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division affirmed, noting that, at the time the plaintiff moved for summary judgment, no depositions or independent medical examinations had been conducted. The court opined that the defendants were entitled to discovery as to the extent of the plaintiff’s injuries and the circumstances surrounding the accident. Therefore, the motion was premature.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Marshall Dennehey | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Marshall Dennehey
Contact
more
less

Marshall Dennehey on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide