New York Court of Appeals Holds Property Policy Time Limitation for Replacement Costs Suits Amounts to “Claim Nullification”

by Wilson Elser
Contact

Facts and Underlying Litigation
Will New York courts enforce a time-limitation period for suits for replacement costs against an insurer under a property policy, even if the insured could not have completed the replacement work in the required time period? No, said the Court of Appeals in its opinion in Executive Plaza, LLC v. Peerless Insurance Co.

Briefly, the key facts in Executive Plaza are as follows: The insured purchased a fire insurance policy with a $1 million limit. The policy offered the insured a choice in coverage – payment of “actual cash value” or “replacement costs.” If the insured elected the latter form of coverage, the policy further provided that coverage would only attach if “the lost or damaged property is actually repaired or replaced” and that all repairs and replacements be made “as soon as reasonably possible after the loss or damage.” As to both forms of coverage, the policy provided that any “legal action” against the insurer under the policy must be “brought within 2 years after the date on which the direct physical [loss] or damage occurred.”

In February 2007, when the insured’s office building suffered severe fire damage, it sought coverage for the loss under its fire policy. Initially, the insured sought and recovered the “actual cash value” ($757,000) for the damaged building. However, it later informed the insurer that it would also make a replacement-cost claim for the approximately $243,000 remaining on its $1 million limit. There was no dispute in the record that the insured acted reasonably to replace the damaged building; however, despite its efforts, it was unable to do so within two years of the building’s damage.

Subsequently, the insured sued the insurer in state court seeking recovery for the replacement costs in question. The insurer responded by removing the suit to federal court, where it successfully moved to dismiss on the ground that the claim was premature since the insured had not yet completed replacement work on the building. That did not occur until October 2010 – 20 months after the expiration of the two-year limitation period provided in the policy for suits against the insurer. Once the insured completed the building repairs, it again sued the insurer in state court, which again removed the suit to federal court, where, this time, it successfully moved to dismiss the claim. In granting the dismissal motion, the federal court cited the deadline set forth in the policy, which barred suits against the insurer filed more than two years after the date of any loss or damage. The court noted that New York courts have consistently upheld the “reasonableness” of such limitation periods.

Court of Appeals Decision
The insured appealed to the Second Circuit, which certified to the Court of Appeals the question of whether a two-year limitation period for suits for replacement costs under the policy is enforceable “if the insured property cannot reasonably be replaced within two years.”

The Court of Appeals held that it was not enforceable. At the outset of its decision, the Executive Plaza court acknowledged that it has enforced shortened limitation periods for actions under policies, noting that there is nothing “inherently unreasonable” about such limitations. The problem in Executive Plaza, however, was not the limitation period, but rather the “accrual period.” The court held that it was unfair and unreasonable to require suit filings within two years of a loss while “imposing a condition precedent to the suit – in this case, completion of replacement of the property – that cannot be met within that period.” As the court put it, a “‘limitation period’ that expires before suit [can] be brought is not really a limitation period at all, but simply a nullification of the claims.”

In so ruling, the court distinguished the result here from an earlier case where it sustained a 12-month suit limitation period in a property policy, noting that, unlike the policy here, that policy “enabled the insured to ‘protect itself’ by … beginning an action before expiration of the limitation period.” (Emphasis supplied.)

Practical Lesson of Executive Plaza
In terms of lessons learned from Executive Plaza, several comments are in order. To begin with, the decision is not a repudiation of limitation on suit periods in property policies. To the contrary, the court reaffirmed in no uncertain terms that such limitations are not “inherently unreasonable.” Second, it was clear from the record in Executive Plaza that the insured had acted reasonably and diligently to complete the repairs and replacement work to the damaged building, but despite its efforts, was unable to do so within two years of the loss date. In other cases, however, the reasonableness of the insured’s efforts is likely to be a disputed fact issue that will need to be resolved on a case-by-case basis. Finally, the outcome here turned on property policy wording that barred the insured from suing until completion of the repairs. What if the policy had permitted the insured to file a protective suit before the expiration of the limitation period? Would the result have been different? The Executive Plaza opinion suggests that in that event an argument could be made that an insured confronting an approaching suit limitation period who fails to file a protective suit before the limitation period lapses has acted “unreasonably” and should be granted no relief from the policy’s suit filing deadline.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Wilson Elser | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Wilson Elser
Contact
more
less

Wilson Elser on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.