New York State Court Applies Rules To Sequence Simultaneous Litigation and Arbitration


Boz Export & Import, Inc. v. Karakus, Dkt. No. 8738/11 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Kings Cty. 2011), expounds on several current and timely topics in international practice but from the perspective of a state court jurist (called a Justice in New York courts). The decision was filed by a New York State judge sitting in a court of first instance having general jurisdiction.

At issue in Boz were motions and cross-motions. The motion was to stay the action pending the disposition of an arbitration. The cross-motion sought to stay the arbitration. Issues and parties overlapped, but not entirely.

We have frequently seen that the issue of the optimal sequencing of disputes is a key issue in determining the success of an international dispute. (See the discussion of sequencing on our e-book, International Practice: Topics and Trends.)

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:


Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.