Nexsen Pruett's LightSwitch - Intellectual Property Law Bulletin: Volume 4, No. 2

Maynard Nexsen
Contact

In This Issue:

- Stanford v. Roche: A Cautionary Tale for Employers with Intellectual Property

- Intellectual Property is 80% of the Value of a Business!

- Avoiding Confrontations with Licensing Firms

Excerpt from "Stanford v. Roche"

The United States Supreme Court reminded us again on June 6, 2011 how important employment contracts can be to companies with intellectual property. In a 7-2 decision, the Court held that the Bayh-Dole Act did not change the long-standing law that patents are initially awarded to inventors rather than to their employers. (Board of Trustees for Leland Stanford Junior University v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., U.S. No. 09-1959) (“Stanford v. Roche”).

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Maynard Nexsen
Contact
more
less

Maynard Nexsen on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide