The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decided a case of first impression regarding the “divisibility” defense to joint
and several liability under the federal Superfund, or “CERCLA.” In Department of Toxic Substances Control v.
Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co., et al., Case No. 03-17125 (9th Cir. 2007) (“Burlington Northern”),
the Court examined the issue of how, in lieu of joint and several liability, the courts could apportion liability
amongst the PRPs when they have been sued in a cost recovery action (as opposed to a contribution action).
Such apportionment would avoid the transaction costs and potential unfairness encountered when PRPs are held liable for contamination they did not cause, and are forced to pursue contribution actions against other responsible parties.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Published In:
Civil Remedies Updates, Environmental Law Updates, Toxic Torts Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising
