Ninth Circuit Finds That Local Rent Control Constitutes a Regulatory Taking

The vexing issue of "regulatory takings" has bubbled up again in a provocative ruling by the Ninth Circuit. In Guggenheim v. City of Goleta, 2009 DJDAR 14205(September 28, 2009), the Ninth Circuit reversed the District Court and struck down the City of Goleta's Rent Control Ordinance ("RCO") as an improper regulatory taking under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. The RCO imposed limitations on the rent increases mobile home park owners could charge for mobile home spaces. The Court based its decision on an earlier regulatory takings case, Penn Central Transp. Co. v. NewYork City, 438 U.S. 104 (1978).

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Administrative Agency Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Residential Real Estate Updates, Zoning, Planning & Land Use Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »